![]() “The empirical support for this gun ban is non-existent, as Caillin Langmann (an assistant professor of medicine at McMaster University) and myself have shown in peer reviewed research,” he said. ![]() Mauser said Monday’s decision seriously undermines hunting, sport shooting and environmental protection in Canada. Government policy was soon revised to include compulsory firearms confiscation, and the PM was again front-and-centre at that year’s remembrance ceremonies in Montreal. In 2021, the government’s decision to move ahead with a voluntary, rather than mandatory, gun buy-back prompted PolySeSouvient to publicly disinvite Trudeau from future École Polytechnique shooting memorials. PolySeSouvient has played a somewhat extraordinary role in the government’s gun control measures. “The authority of the government to limit what type of guns can legally be owned by Canadians is explicit and unequivocal.” ![]() “This ruling should propel the Trudeau government to rapidly implement its repeated campaign commitments to ban all military-style assault weapons not reasonably used for hunting,” the statement read. He added that Monday’s decision should be “concerning to all Canadians.”Ī statement from anti-gun group PolySeSouvient urged the Trudeau Liberals to go further in their efforts. ![]() “It seems that Justice Kane has concluded, in writing, that the government owes no procedural fairness to Canadians in these types of matters and that all the government need do is scrawl out a preamble in an Order in Council to take whatever they want, whenever they want.” “We promised we would fight this unjust and irresponsible action by this Liberal-NDP government, and we will continue to do just that until every avenue and opportunity is exhausted,” he said. Simon Fraser University’s Gary Mauser disputed that number, and last November told the National Post that costs could easily exceed that number by at least a billion dollars - a figure that largely depends on the exact number of legally owned firearms in Canada.ĬCFR CEO Rod Giltaca expressed dismay over Monday’s decision. “These weapons were designed for one purpose and one purpose only: to kill the largest number of people in the shortest amount of time,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said while announcing the ban. “The Governor in Council formed the opinion that the prescribed firearms are not reasonable for use in hunting and sport, and the opinion and decision to prescribe the firearms as prohibited are reasonable.”Īnnouncement of the government’s order-in-council came one week after the April 2020 Nova Scotia shootings that claimed 22 lives. “The Governor in Council did not exceed the statutory grant of authority delegated to it by Parliament pursuant to subsection 117.15(2) of the Criminal Code,” the decision read. Kane said the order-in-council did not exceed the authority of Parliament, nor does it infringe on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Canadian Bill of Rights, or portions of the Criminal Code that deal with firearms. ![]() In a ruling issued Monday, Federal Court Judge Catherine M. The 2020 directive instantly - without passing legislation in Parliament - reclassified around 1,500 popular firearms to prohibited status, including those described as so-called “military-style” or “assault” firearms. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |